P.J. Clarke's, the use of Courier--and leggings are not pants.

GK received an impromptu invitation last night--as is common in Manhattan; knowing that one's friends are likely working within a two-mile (or twenty minutes on the train) radius leads to many  last-minute invites--to P.J. Clarke's, one of the bars featured in Mad Men.

And my friend "happened" to be dressed like Peggy Olson.

You can tell how old it is when you go in--the bar is well-weathered, there are interior stained glass details, and it manages to be very cozy and warm on, say, the first day of hail (yes, hail!--though it's gone up to 53 again today) for the season. Drinking the house sidecar (which involved the bartender setting the lemon briefly on fire before throwing it into my friend's drink) and a gin and tonic, we were amazed by how very Mad Men-esque the place still felt--many professional men, few women, discussions about investments and stock portfolios and contracts and trains to the suburbs.

Yes. The perfect amount of civilized: no New Yorker logo man posture; no monocles; no hushed voices--or spilled drinks, yelling, or pushing, either. The people on our left ordered oysters; the people on our right ordered beer and watched the game--and both parties were perfectly happy.

Soon--odds being in our favor--two well-dressed young men approached my friend and me, inquired about our beverages, locations, jobs.

"Do you make people send you everything in courier?" one asked.

It's a fair question. A number of New Yorkers still think of writers as people who sit in their West Village apartments with typewriters, looking down on bohemians and lively street scenes below. It's been many years since that was the case (or since writers without trust funds could afford Village digs), but it's a pleasant image, and has stuck.

Here's the truth of the matter, though: I have never once taken on a project that came to me in Courier. Does this mean that I won't? Of course not! It's just a coincidence that I find amusing.

Does this mean fonts matter? No, not really: with a few CTRL-As and CTRL-Ds, it's taken care of, and I hardly remember.

I think it's more the personality type that sometimes goes with the font.

My friend (yes, the one dressed as Peggy Olson) mentioned that it's a great font for proofreading, since all of the letters (and therefore the errors) become quite large. So, yes. Maybe that will help you in proofreading, and not help you during submissions.

But I think most writers (especially those reading blogs, especially YA writers) are very--well--of the moment, even if it's because they have teenage children (who inevitably are surprised that their mother or father is cool enough to write for teens, but that's another matter). Courier has been out of fashion, in my mind, for years. And, unlike leggings (again: they're not pants!), I think it will stay out of fashion.

Again, would anyone ever reject you for your font? No. And, just to be clear, if we had a meeting with you, I wouldn't reject you for fanny packs, overalls, disco wear, poodle skirts or whatever else you like. I'd probably think it was cool. No worries.

You can imagine the strange questions I've gotten about my work over the years ("Do you enjoy rejecting people?" "Do you hate writers?" "Do you wish you could just never read again?" "Do you get a lot of paper cuts?"--No, no, no, and yes--occupational hazard). Surely you must have some too.

Ask away, fellow writers--anonymously, if you like. The weirdest agent life questions you can think of. GK will be pleased and amused, no g&t necessary.

Today's beverage is yet another French press coffee. On cold days, I can't get enough.

26 comments:

Rowenna said...

That sounds lovely--I live in a college town, and a "just right" civilized establishment is hard to find--most are either the beer-sloshing student bars or the straight-backed professor dens. Congrats on discovering a gem! And anytime you have an excuse to dress like Peggy it's a good thing.

Anonymous said...

How do agents afford rent?

Anonymous said...

Tell us your worst paper cut story. Go.

Agency Gatekeeper said...

Anon 11:44: As you'll notice, a lot of agents are leaving the business and/or switching to jobs with higher starting salaries. It's tough out there right now, but it will (we all collectively hope) get better.

In other news, many of us live in Brooklyn. Paying 1500 a month for a 10x8 room ("Manhattan studio") does not appeal to most of us.

Agency Gatekeeper said...

Anon 11:48:
It involved antiseptic, band-aids, and a lot of whining.

Anonymous said...

How much is personality involved when an agent decides to take on a client? Example: Would most agents shy away from signing someone they didn't feel a connection with if they penned an amazing book? Similarly, what about signing someone with a kick-butt attitude but a book that requires more work?

Stacey Wunsch said...

We all hear stories about the sheer quantity of queries agents receive, but I was wondering how many actual contenders are out there floating around. I guess what I'm really asking, is how much real competition is there for writers who have gotten good feedback, but just haven't been picked up by an agent. I hope that makes sense.

CuteySnail said...

What kind of sleep hours are agents logging? Do you stay up way late to get through piles of requests, or do you do your reading in the office?

Agency Gatekeeper said...

Anon 12:12:

It depends. If a potential client is socially awkward but well-intended, no worries. I think it mostly comes down to whether they're well-intended, and if I'd trust them on the phone with editors. If they're downright unpleasant--no. It's just not going to work.

But it can certainly work the other way. If I think a novel is fixer-upper with a lot of potential, and then client is willing to work and happy and pleasant--yes, that can be the difference.

Agency Gatekeeper said...

Stacey,
I'd put it this way:

If we assume 10 percent (probably a bit high) of queries result in a request, and 10 percent of requests (again, high) result in a personalized response, then you're in the top 1 percent.

Once within that top 1 percent, yes, there are others--we do get a LOT of work--but you're still in 1 percent that has the very best chance.

Agency Gatekeeper said...

CuteySnail:
I can't speak for other agents, but my usual schedule is:

1. Read on the train in the morning.

2. Read maybe 1/3 or 1/4th of the day at work. There are many other things to do that can only be done at work; reading can be done anywhere.

3. Read on the train.

4. Go out/see friends/make dinner/run errands/etc. Get home around 9 or 10.

5. Read from 10 until about midnight, unless there's an especially enticing episode of something on Hulu.

6. Repeat.

Suzanne said...

"Once within that top 1 percent, yes, there are others--we do get a LOT of work--but you're still in 1 percent that has the very best chance."

This is heartening. Except I sent my submission to you in Courier AND didn't write a little note at the top.

It sounds like I'm in big, big trouble. (or, to use an expression older than the font, Alack!)

Cynthia said...

When writers query you, or leave comments like this how often do you check to see if they have a blog?

Agency Gatekeeper said...

Cynthia,
Not very often, I confess. If the query doesn't come with sample pages and I have no idea (since, sometimes, there simply isn't enough information) then, yes, I'll look into it. If I really like an author and want to see what else they're up to, yes. Otherwise--well, I have a lot of reading to do!

Agency Gatekeeper said...

Suzanne,
None of these things disqualify you. :) The note at the top is just a nice bonus.

Suzanne said...

Thank you, GK. I was like Dorothy, then, averting my eyes from the agent behind the curtain.

The next ms, of course, is in TNR.

Lauren said...

Something I've always wondered: how do you deal with eye strain, now that most submissions are electronic? I can only stare at a screen for so long before my eyeballs feel like a grouchy kitty got a hold of them (not that it stops me from all-night write-a-thons, of course).

Agency Gatekeeper said...

Lauren,
For whatever reason, it doesn't really bother me. I usually make the font really big and lean back in my chair, scrolling down and holding the mouse like it's a remote--but I don't know if that helps. It's just comfier for me.

Terry Stonecrop said...

I love this post! I love Mad Men. I so want to go to that bar. How did I ever miss it while in NY. Next time.

Ok, gush over. My burning questions:

She really dressed like Peggy Olson?

Does it matter if writers are social media butterflies even before they get published?

Also, so many writers go crazy trying to get more followers for their blogs. I can't imagine, unless you have ten thousand or more, it really matters to agents, especially since they're almost all other writers...But maybe it does?

Thanks for asking us to ask.

Agency Gatekeeper said...

Terry,
Yes, quite a lot like Peggy. She was wearing a red turtleneck and a gray jumper-like dress. She's blond, but her hair was in a ponytail. I guess Peggy from the first or second season.

Also: blogs? Followers? I confess I don't really care. I think of it as a nice bonus, and if your posts are especially witty, that's lovely. But if you're writing fiction--yeah. Whatever. No need.

And I think in terms of hits, not followers.

Agency Gatekeeper said...

However, I imagine there are some agents who care more.

bigblackcat97 said...

What's your typical process with partials and fulls? Do tend to read them right away or set certain things aside for later? And what's your desk look like right now... in other words, is it a good time to query you?

Agency Gatekeeper said...

BigBlackCat97,
It's always a good (and terrible) time to send me queries. I will always have more than 50 queries in my inbox, probably always have more than 80 or 100 manuscripts waiting for me.

But, at the same time, I'm always excited about the new works that can pour in.

I do my best to start with the older ones but, realistically, that's not what happens--I go for whatever looks, well, like the most fun to read--or the most urgent. If I know something's going to go quickly, I'll read it as soon as I can; if I requested something out of obligation (say, I know the author and/or the author has a great platform, but I'm just not jazzed about the material) I'll let it sit a little longer.

I also have a bad habit of thinking about works when I'm not sure. Some say it's an unqualified Yes or it's a fast No--but I can't quite bring myself to reject anything until I'm very sure. This elongates the wait for some writers.

In terms of my physical desk, I have a stack of royalty statements ready to go out, a manuscript I loved but can't get my office to love (yes, submitted hard copy), a ton of rubber bands and paper clips in an empty tin of Twinings Irish Breakfast (not my favorite, but the green is pretty) loose tea, two calculators (math is not my strong suit), a ton of pens, scissors, etc--too many post-its--and a few business cards for people I met recently and have to e-mail. I try to keep it neat, but often fail.

Terry Stonecrop said...

I think it's so cool she dressed like Peggy:)

And thanks for answering my blog questions. I realize not all agents think the same way on the subject. But I appreciate your opinion.

Anonymous said...

Oh my. Can you please come to California and lecture ladies on the whole leggings are not pants thing?? The rule hasn't reached the West Coast yet :-)

Bekah said...

YES!!! Leggins aren't pants. Neither are stupid Jeggings! Especially if they are sooo tight they become see-through. And I love to hear about cool NYC places and life : 0