As previously mentioned, this time of year is kind of ridiculous. I get into the coffee, (Freudian slip! I meant office!) and I can feel the blood change in my veins: it's sort of a cross between AAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHRRRRRRGGGGGGGHHH, I'll never keep up! and OMG there is so much awesome. I am overloading on awesome. This is like eating an entire pint of Phish Food and not caring about the approaching stomachache awesome. (Yes, GK likes the little chocolate fishies.)
Though I no longer get to have the yearly ritual of sharpening pencils (that smell! That delicious smell!), trying out new pens (always the ones that make a mark like liquid ink Pilots), deciding between wide or college-ruled (always college) and binders (I do miss the Lisa Frank--and even Trapper Keepers) and erasers and white-out and those donut-shaped stickers that reinforce binder holes--there's still something special. The leaves are rustling differently; I can tell they're starting to dry and think about changing colors. The NYU and Columbia kids have shown up, and the city is overflowing with OMG NYC is AMAZING and all my dreams are going to come true! Here! Right now! excitement. And Starbucks is releasing their pumpkin-flavored products. I can't wait for those cream cheese pumpkin cupcakes.
But what's happening in the meantime? Well. I've been avoiding looking at my queries inbox because, quite frankly, I'm kind of terrified. My guess? 800-something. Here we go...and....
158. Wow! I guess everyone is on vacation too.
Manuscripts waiting? GK's guess: 130.
Actual manuscripts? 128. Ha! Off by two. But there are a few that were sent to my account, so add about 10 more.
Contracts to edit a final time: 1
Clients' manuscripts to edit: 2.
Angry author check-ins: 6
Polite author check-ins: 2.
Publishing parties coming up this week: 2. One Brooklyn Book Mingle or something-or-other (same people), one KidLit.
Former intern to meet for drinks (yesterday): 1. We had frozen cosmopolitans, which were like red slurpees + vodka...but in a good way.
Interns to interview: 6
Out-of-town guests expected: 1
Housewarming to help throw for a friend who finally realized, after years in Manhattan, that Brooklyn is the way to go: 1
Cards to send: 3 (one birthday, one thank you, one "I miss you, you're in France"). I'm on a huge real mail kick, even if it's a dollar and takes a week (!) to get stuff to France.
Times this week I've wished I didn't kill my color printer, so I could print cards with images of my choosing: 4-5
IKEA desk chairs assembled, thus invalidating my last excuse for not writing: 1. I had to use an oven mitt to avoid harming my hands while using their included wrench-like tool. Felt pretty buff...but now I have to, you know, write stuff. And find something for its four feet, so it doesn't ruin my floor.
* * *
What does all of this mean? GK's been really, really busy.
Now, all agents are busy. All the time. Some handle it better than others. Some (like Snarky) drink a lot. (Though I think he exaggerates about how much he drinks at work.) Some (though not so much any more) blog about how they have stacks of manuscripts everywhere--on the stove, under the cat. Some start blasting form-rejects in every which direction, just to clear their desks. Some go into hiding. And some put up auto-responses and start revising their website's guidelines for how and when to check in.
But there's a general order of priorities for us, and by knowing our psychology, you can better gauge when to check in with us, and how.
By the way, a few of you from this blog checked in with me this week, and I'm not talking about you. You are always lovely. I'm referring to the uninformed masses here.
First of all. Here's now not check in on a manuscript (yes, actual material from the past two weeks):
Dear GK,
At your early convenience, I would appreciate an update on where you are with [Manuscript]. If the book is to cause the change in today’s thinking about [subject matter] it must sell extensively.
I forwarded [Manuscript] to you for consideration in late July. At that time I discontinued all efforts to find an agent, as I felt it might be counterproductive to the Agency’s representation of it.
I am mailing a hard copy of it to you separately as it is too lengthy to email easily.
Sincerely,
[Author]
Then the author overnighted a copy of her book. $16 in postage! Way to make GK feel awful.
As I mentioned before, it's never a good idea to give an agent an unrequested exclusive--especially without telling them about it! And don't spend so darn much on postage. Priority mail, if you must mail something hard copy, is just fine.
As a follow-up, this did not work. This was received last week, and I haven't gotten back to her. Why?
Because whenever I think about it, I feel guilty. Guilt is the least productive emotion to evoke in an agent.
Now, all agents feel some amount of guilt all of the time. There's simply no way that we can keep up. There will always be at least a few authors we don't get back to in a timely fashion. So we develop a tolerance for guilt--we learn to live with it, and in some cases, repress it. Giving us more guilt won't get us to hop-to; it'll make us try not to think about you and your manuscript. Will we feel instantly better when we get back to you? Yes. Does that mean that, like a kid who has a report due in two weeks, we'll get right on that? No.
* * *
Here's how we usually prioritize:
- Our clients. Always first, unless they've done something like gone on Jerry Springer and ranted about their agents. Bad behavior makes us prioritize other clients first.
- Other agency stuff to do. There's always something, whether it's preparing for meetings or finding interns or planning parties for authors that belong to the agency but aren't, personally, ours.
- The authors we're most excited about, whose work we've read a little of and/or know will be good. We know we have to say Yes before another agent does. These works get placed immediately on Kindles and are read whenever possible.
- The requested manuscripts.
- Requesting work from queries.
- Rejecting manuscripts
- Rejecting queries
In other words, saying Yes is of much higher priority than saying No. Saying yes is exciting and needs to be done quickly; saying No is uncomfortable and, sometimes, we're not sure--and the no is quite reluctant. However, this doesn't mean that a longer wait is necessarily a no--it sometimes just means that we haven't read your work yet and will get excited about it when we do. Sometimes queries don't do manuscripts justice--or are just good enough to get a request.
So, when your work comes in, it gets quickly sorted into one of three groups:
So, when your work comes in, it gets quickly sorted into one of three groups:
- Totally amazing. Read right-effing-now. I mark these with a bright green Promising label. Thank you, Gmail.
- Not sure yet. Will have to read.
- Reluctantly requested. If, for example, an author has an amazing platform but I don't like their query (but feel obligated to request it), the work goes here.
Then, after reading about fifty pages, they're sorted again:
- OMFG. I'm finishing this right now. If I had a desk of manuscripts, I would, like in the movies, pick up everything else and shove it off.
- Mehhhh. Not sure. I'll have the interns read it to see what they think. Then, if they say no and I disagree and worry about losing it, I'll read the rest; if they say yes and I still don't feel excited about it, I'll know to say no.
- Next! Marked to reject later. Sometimes I read things the same day they came in--and make decisions that day, too. Or I'll be home, reading the manuscript at 11 pm--and won't, of course, email the author then. This leads to an unfortunate impression for the author, so I'll wait a few days.
Also, another dirty secret: if we're not sure about a manuscript, we'll sit on it. Think about it. See if it keeps popping up in our brains. If it does, it gets another look. If not--and if no one else gives it an offer (another reason to never grant exclusives!)--we edge toward No.
There you have it--GK in the midst of manuscript triage.
Hope this finds you well, happy, and pencil shaving-scented,
GK
14 comments:
Thank you for sharing some insight into your world! It's nice to get a reminder once in a while that you guys are *super* busy, too! (And it helps us appreciate the entire process even more!)
Sounds like the beginning of fall--all the hustle and bustle of back-to-school craziness but without the classes :) But I hear you on the promise of pumpkin-y things at Starbucks...makes all the flurry of fall melt away. For a minute.
Thanks for sharing these secrets. I can see why saying, "yes," comes first.
Never mind the slurpees and vodka! Would make a good a sundowner for a hot night.
Try not to drown in the manuscripts:)
Now I wish I had some Phish Food.
Glimpses into agent brains are always great, even if such a long blog post *could* have been written to replace the now-put-together Ikea desk's reason for not writing other stuff... Ahem. Just sayin' ;)
Here's a question that may sound insane: what if an agent(s) ask for your full and you send it, but in the meantime, you've started a completely different kind of MS (still YA) that you *know* is much stronger, much more the kind of voice you want to be associated with as an author?
Do you wait for the no (or even the yes) or do you check-in with honesty? Something like "I'm writing a new novel I'd love to have you read a few months down the line, if the concept grabs you. Go ahead and take my full off your list, because I know your time for requested material is valuable, and I'm much more passionate and excited about what I am working on right now.
*whew*-- P.S. I'm claiming my title as queen of Mormon Vampire Porn as my Get Out of Snark Free card on this one;)
PPS-- It's almost applesauce and apple pie and apple crisp season here. And our favorite ice cream to go with said apple-licious treats? You guessed it, Phish Food (said the girl who used to follow that crazy band around the country, many wild years ago).
To be honest...
Thanks. Really, thanks. Most of what I read consists of agents looking for a "no" or a reason to brush something new aside for something easy, something ideal. It is reading these attitudes constantly that just make me wonder...
...Wonder where the hell I'm going to fit in a world like that. But hearing someone talk more positively about the work you do is fantastic, and yes, encouraging. Thanks and thanks again.
PS- I hang my head sometimes when I go into Starbuck's (which is every day or every other day) and I'll stay for at least an hour. It makes me sad (just a little) that I am such a cliche. A writer... in Starbucks... And the cupcakes you talk about are already out where I'm from. :)
Ahh, pencil shavings. A good memory, thank you. A great scent--provided, of course, they are from genuine wooden pencils, and not those synthetic plasticy things they tried to push on us in junior high.
Loved this peek behind the curtain into an agents day. And here I thought they were full of martinis, manuscripts and merriment!
It actually does sound like fun.
Good luck with all that reading.
I'd be curious as to just how many "keepers" there were among the hopefuls in that bulging inbox...
Thanks so much, this is really helpful. Now I sort of know what might be happening o my manuscript when it's off in agent land :)
OMG, a lengthy, informative, and funny post. But all I can think about is my trapper keeper from gradeschool and my Lisa Frank Gumball folder...
Bon Jovi and Michael J. Fox held serious face time taped on my TK. I seriously just had an aqua net flashback.
I only saw one thing missing in your account: R and Rs. How do they fit in for you, and when and where?
Very interesting post. Some of it had me sitting at attention, and some of it had me squirming. : )
Funny, too, that even with this inside info, once the ms is handed off, it remains out of our hands; all we can do is present our best writing, and all we can be certain of is the wait.
Emily, what do you mean R and Rs? Sorry, haven't had coffee yet.
GK just noticed Emily's comment at the end of this and I think she was referring to a "revise and resubmit". I could be wrong, but it appears as though a lot of agents are doing this prior to signing clients right now.
In addition to Emily's question, and along the lines of avoiding exclusives for the sake of potentially drumming up interest from multiple parties, would you advise against querying in very small quantities? On one hand, you don't exhaust your pool of targeted agents as quickly, but on the other hand you most likely give up the possibility of having offers coming in that you can use to your advantage.
Just curious. I've always been of the camp to query only a few at a time and then go from there, but if an agent is on the fence and waiting to see if someone else "makes a move" on the ms, then maybe this isn't the best way to go about it.
Thanks for any advice:-)
Hey GK. Needing coffee myself, here! : )
I meant revise and resubmits -- if you/the agency do them and where they fit into the yes's, no's and on the fence moments that you mentioned in your post.
Made me curious to see if there was a gray area between yes's and no's.
Off I go for that coffee.
Post a Comment