The Forest of Hands and Teeth

When you wake up and your very first thought is of the book you're reading...well, then, you know it's good. I've just finished The Forest of Hands and Teeth. Does it have problems? Um, yes. I'm amazed no one took the author aside and said, You know, if you keep using "the ocean" as your hit-us-over-the-head obvious symbol for "hope outside the current situation"--and don't insert any other such symbols--and repeat it every other page--you're going to annoy some readers.

This is one situation in which I'd like prefer an e-version of a book--just to search it and see how many times the phrase "the ocean" pops up. Oh, goodness gracious. It gets a bit ridiculous.

That said, the book is really compelling--the protagonist lives in a village in the center of a forest, with only a fence to protect them from the Unconsecrated (aka all of the zombies and former-humans-turned-zombies that inhabit the place). The Sisters, a sect of religious/political women who set rules for the village, have told everyone that there is nothing in the world beyond their walls--except, you know, monsters that will eat you/turn you into them. But then the protagonist sees evidence of a young woman from another village, who the Sisters go to great lengths to hide. And thus the story really begins.

Oh, and there's a love subplot too, but it's pretty lame.

That said, I read this in 1.5 days, rather enjoying myself as I did. Proof that you can love works, just like you can love people, without them being perfect. And yes, I would have said yes to this. With edits.

* * *
An addendum, from the comments. Tahereh mentioned that the whole book is so hopeless, it's a rather difficult (unpleasant) read. I agree.

Um, SPOILER ALERT! So:

I also really disliked that whole bit about how she should have seen that Travis was better than any ocean. Isn't that like saying, "That's okay, girls--give up your dreams. Didn't you know that you can find everything you possibly want in your husband/boyfriend who was about to let you marry his brother? [I would argue that means He's Just Not That Into Her.] Who needs the world out there--be locked with him in a house/fortress/tree house/canned goods storage unit! Let him make inane comments about photographs and don't let it bother you! Waste a ton of valuable weaponry/communications devices shooting at Unconsecrated even though there are more than you can ever take down! And--most of all--never tell the reader if you're sharing a bed or *sharing a bed* with the totally built-up love interest--for months! [Goodness, their scene locked among the *nuns* was hotter than those--what--four months?] Ocean, smoshen. Stay home, try on dresses, and cook."

Uggh.

10 comments:

ajcastle said...

I'm actually reading this right now. I'm not sure how I feel about it yet. There are a lot of things that bother me about it, yet, I find myself wanting to know what happens. So, I guess that's good.

That said, I agree there are some issues. For starters, is the protag EVER described? The only thing I know is that Travis is blond. I don't need everything described in detail--but I kind of like some description. I can't picture these people at all. And I don't understand their relationships. I guess I am more of a 'relationship' reader. I prefer love story type novels.

It reminds me of The Hunger Games in the sense that it is postapocalyptic, but that's really it. I much preferred THG.

Tahereh said...

oof, yea... i finished FH&T with a very bitter taste in my mouth. i was so utterly disappointed. there were so many glaring, gaping holes in the plot, so many unresolved, unidentified problems and issues with the characters, the setting, the past and the possible future, that i wished i'd never read it. i literally put the book down with a very audible WTH?
it made me wonder why people were making such a big deal about it.

maybe it's just me? but i can't stand books that are blatantly depressing with absolutely no sparks of momentary reprieve from the horror. what little good came about in the story was quickly destroyed. i can't stand that sort of thing.

bleh.

The Rejection Room said...

That's true, Tahereh--there was very little hope.

I also really disliked that whole bit about how she should have seen that Travis was better than any ocean. Isn't that like saying, "That's okay, girls--give up your dreams. Didn't you know that you can find everything you possibly want in your husband/boyfriend who was about to let you marry his brother? [I would argue that means He's Just Not That Into Her.] Who needs the world out there--be locked with him in a house/fortress/tree house/canned goods storage unit! Let him make inane comments about photographs and don't let it bother you! Waste a ton of valuable weaponry/communications devices shooting at Unconsecrated even though there are more than you can ever take down! And--most of all--never tell the reader if you're sharing a bed or *sharing a bed* with the totally built-up love interest--for months! [Goodness, their scene locked among the *nuns* was hotter than those--what--four months?] Ocean, smoshen. Stay home, try on dresses, and cook."

Uggh.

Anonymous said...

I'd like to know how things like this get published with so many problems. I've had my book rejected quite a lot and it doesn't have nearly as many issues as this book seems to have. I've had it edited at a literary consultancy, and the 'problems' it has, I believe aren't necessarily bad things, but things that make the protagonist realistic in my opinion. She said the story line/plot is strong, and intriguing enough to make the reader need to keep reading - but the protagonist is too passive. Sure, that's just one consultant's opinion, sure it could have so many other problems than I'm not aware of, but my point is, can anyone tell me how there is so much published literature out there that is no where near perfect? I just don't get it. Ok - that was my rant.

Tahereh said...

ahahahaha

i nearly forgot about those parts!! (i read the book last summer) but, wow. you definitely hit it on the head.

im so happy im not the only one who thought those scenes were ridiculous. the rest of the world seems to think this book is amazing.

it was.. good, i think, in that i actually finished it (unlike BEAUTIFUL CREATURES which was so slow-moving that I almost forgot I own a half-read copy lodged somewhere between pillows or seat cushions or maybe under the bed), but it definitely needed work. a lot.

your book reviews are so helpful! it's great insight into how agents read/view/analyze published books. thanks!!

:D

:) said...

"Ocean, smoshen. Stay home, try on dresses, and cook." -- Gatekeeper today.

"Cooking is cool, yo." -- Post of Gatekeeper Past.

I haven't read the book and you make good points but that's a can of worms I've been wondering about lately, actually (me and worms, we go way back).

Do you think the fiction market sometimes encourages unhealthy messages, or like television should it sometimes just be deemed "for entertainment purposes" and, like psychic readings and dreams of spontaneous combustion at literary parties not be read into too deeply?

:)

The Rejection Room said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Mark said...

I agree that this book could have been made much stronger with more editorial guidance. The premise held so much promise, and the opening conflict was quite gripping. Mind you, I have no idea where it started and how much the editors over at Delacorte worked with her on revisions, but another pass would have helped.

One thing I love about this book is the first chapter. It is one of the best I have ever read (and may be part of the hype--people read that and not the rest and think it wonderful).

I analyzed it chapter by chapter last year, and here is the blog post with more comments: Book analysis of Forest of Hands and Teeth

Delilah S. Dawson said...

See, the original post made me think, "Fascinating! I should read that!" But the subsequent posts totally turned me off. It sounds like an intriguing world and premise that took a wrong turn at Albuquerque. I'm not into hopeless worlds.

Well, except Slushworld.

The Rejection Room said...

Delilah,
I'm with you. I need a happy ending.

Here, I wouldn't say it's happy, but it's...content. Just like (as the others will confirm) the protagonist has been told to hope for. Bad things happen, yes. A lot of bad things. But the protagonist seems to feel more hopeless than her fate would make strictly necessary. She's not being unreasonable, not by a long shot--but things turn out better than she thinks they will.

Actually, now that I think of it, it shouldn't be "hopeless"--it should be "bleak."

Somehow, I still liked it, and believe you me, I have a hard time with unhappy literature.