Are any of these "put it down and reject" mistakes? Two. I'll let you guess which ones. But the rest are things you may wish to avoid.
I post this mostly so that you can see that a lot of our mail is very, very strange--and those scary statistics you hear about the odds of getting published are misleading--needlessly grim--as they include the very odd submissions, too.
I post this mostly so that you can see that a lot of our mail is very, very strange--and those scary statistics you hear about the odds of getting published are misleading--needlessly grim--as they include the very odd submissions, too.
And yes, these are all from just today:
- Apologizing for your query in the very first line. Four people did this today. This is akin to saying, "I'm sorry you have to spend time with me. If you want to leave, you can" the moment you meet a romantic prospect. No no no.
- Queries under fifty words. If brevity is (as Dorothy Parker wrote) the soul of lingerie, yours consists of one ribbon and one doily.
- Writing a book about recreational activities while under the influence of illegal drugs. Bad enough, but then assuming a, "So, you know how...? Isn't that funny?" tone. I'm sorry, no, I don't know about going to a skate park after shooting up. And it seems somewhat impolite to imply that I would.
- S&M queries in the second person. I think Emily Post would agree that one should not include such things in business correspondence.
- Sending a beyond-deadpan query for a humor book.
- Sentences like, "So far you are thinking, why am I reading this right?"
- Discussing your financial difficulties in your query. This makes one uncomfortable. Uncomfortable is pretty far from, "Yes! I must see this book!" on the emotional spectrum.
- If your work is called Poison, do not call your files, "Poison for [name of agent].doc." Actually, this one amused me, and I'll take a look.
- Sending the work in seven separate emails (one chapter per). This makes it impossible to keep all your work in one place at one time (or apply my nifty multi-colored labels). Then I worry that I'll reply to one, and not others, then forget about it, then reject it again. Bad. Bad bad bad. Headache=increase.
- "I won't lie and say this doesn't need polishing."
- Don't slip in and out of third person when describing yourself.
- Four ellipses and three exclamation points in the first paragraph of the pitch...sigh!
- Quoting unfavorable reviews of your first project. You would do this...why?
- Saying, "Thank you for agreeing to represent me"--twice--before I've even seen the work.
- "I have written what I consider, a good book, that I hope will intrigue you. I have never made an attempt at writing before, but I believe this book has all the elements of a best seller."
- Emoticons. No.
- Spending the first paragraph talking about how your market is glutted.
- Saying of the competing works: "They are all full of crap."
- Eight footnotes in the body of your query = bad.
- And finally, my very favorite: writing, in the very first line, that you would rather work without an agent.
12 comments:
So after all that, is the barometric pressure still steady? :)
I'll take my 150 high school students over your 200 queries any day! :) Of course, you're earning your wings and halo a little faster than I am.
Wow.
You just made me feel infinitely better about my own query (even my first attempt at writing one which, BTW, sucked eggs).
Really? Apologizing for making you read their query/work? Seriously? If that doesn't scream confidence for their work I don't know what does.
Sorry, I'm feeling snarkalicious today. *blush*
"Emoticons. No"
This one made me laugh, unlike a couple of other ones that made me squirm with discomfort.
Another cold remedy recommendation - Equate's Extra Strength Headache Relief. It's generic (we get ours at Wal-Mart here in WY). An acquaintance suggested it to me, and I confess to never having bought one single Equate product in my life before this one. I'd never even heard of "Equate".
However, it is THE miracle wonder of headache relief, I have found.
Hope it helps.
I don't know if I'd trade 200 queries for 150 kids--the great thing is that all of these writers are not only via email (so I can block them if they get really rowdy) but also separate. No mob mentality here. Were they to get together--on a playground or at a conference--I'm not so sure. :)
If I were an agent, the 2 instarejects would be:
"S&M queries in the second person." (Ew.)
and
"writing, in the very first line, that you would rather work without an agent." (Go for it - start querying editors!)
I agree that emoticons present too informal an impression for queries, but it's hard to hold a grudge against a :) As long as it's not in the actual book. It'll be a sad day when the number one bestseller is "Vampire :) :) :)"
:)
Oh, that made me laugh. And yes, feel a little better. At least I am not such a (channeling Miss Snark) nit wit!1 I particularly enjoyed the following:
"I have written what I consider, a good book, that I hope will intrigue you. I have never made an attempt at writing before, but I believe this book has all the elements of a best seller."
The ego astonishes.
1 - But really, what's wrong with footnotes? :)
Ha! Vampire :) :) :)! I imagine that means there are three vampires, and they are all well-fed? :) I suppose the alternate title could be Girls Who Got Munched By Vampires :( :( :( or Drained :( :( :( or...
:-D
Haha, you are much kinder than me. All of those are instant rejects for me (except for the one with the attachment called Poison--since I would have had to read the query to see that). I have so many queries that I am waiting for an excuse (not even a reason) to hit the reject button. Crazy queries are attention-grabbing for the wrong reasons, but they are nothing compared to crazy phone calls.
-a fellow agent
Ha ha -- or if the Kindle Gods will allow such sophisticated text when all paper books are catapulted to the sun to delay (or hasten) its eventual demise, Girls Who Got Munched by This Gnarly Dude:
\/ <- Evil eyebrows
@ @ <- Hypnotic eyes
\/\/ <- Irresistible Fangs
Perfect for nighttime bath reading in one of those thunderstorms with the ghosty-sounding wind and all. :)
Hee! Irresistible fangs! I do hope those are represented somewhat well in the Kindle. That's an interesting point, though--will the Kindle make illustrated books a thing of the past? At least on the not-very-readerly Tablet, graphic novels will be in full color.
And I bet the Kindle could, someday, be very good at replicating those children's books with the sounds. You know, the ones where there's a picture of a horse, and you hit the button on the right with a horse, and it makes a clomping sound? Except, of course, it'd be in mp3 format, attached somehow to the Kindle book. How strange.
Hmm. . .good points. ("The cow goes, 'Moo!'") I don't have one (not sure if I want one yet) so I don't know how the graphics are really. But even if they come out with better (and more expensive?) screens, will they ever be able to render justice to a pop-up book?
they could create holographic pop up books.
This entire article was an ego booster. I would never insinuate an agent has an affinity for illegal substances in a query.
I am surprised there weren't any semi threatening queries. "If i get one more form rejection letter..."
Post a Comment