Author Mistakes You Won't Make

Dear Authors,
We expect some mistakes, and are as forgiving as we can be. However, the writers below have exhibited behavior that is not ideal. Please learn from their mistakes.

Amusing opening query lines:

Basically, I'm a young, good looking, highly marketable, STD-free author that you can send on Letterman and I'll get laughs or on Oprah and I will not only jump on the couch, but also any coffee table, chair or ottoman present on the set. I get attention.

Lesson: Perhaps you are attractive, and this does show the author's ability to get attention--and some degree of voice. However, your personal medical records have no place in a query (unless you are writing a medical memoir or something otherwise related--this author was not) or professional correspondence. Also, I know publishing is made up of many, many women--but it's insulting to imply that we're going to give you a favorable response just because you say you're attractive.

Pasted below this letter is a sample of Death by Cucumber, which might interest you. This novel, if it must have a label, is “soft-core” literary.

Lesson: Puns are tricky. I giggled to myself when I read this, which put me in a good mood for the rest of the query. However, this is very risky. I ended up passing.

Here's a response to our rejecting a memoir of a man's quest to bed as many women in as many places around the globe as possible:

Well I can't say that I'm NOT surprised the book is being passed up on and must say this is a HUGE mistake because when the book is published its going to be ADORED by MILLIONS of readers, women especially, and easily for sure will be more popular then any other book you might take on and sell to a publisher...

Lesson: It is never, never productive to write to an agent when 1) angry, or 2) in the first five minutes after receiving a rejection. Always wait a day--sleep on it--and limit your comments to "Thank you for your time" or some variant thereof. You must be careful about not burning bridges. Again, the world of publishing is very, very, very small.

Correspondence with a manuscript (this is attached to draft number three of the same work):

Hi,

Here is a sexier and more complete proposal.

How long do you think it will take before I hear how much you love it?

Thanks.


Lessons: First of all, don't send us three drafts of your manuscript. Don't even send two. If you need more time before your partial is ready, ask for it, or say something like, "I'm so pleased to receive your request--I will send this to you within two weeks." Try not to send one version and then, a week or two later, write something like, "WAIT! DON'T READ THE LAST ONE! READ THIS ONE!" First of all, whatever edits you have made are very unlikely to change our mind with regard to whether or not you're a good fit for us. We aren't looking for perfection--we're looking for that which inspires us. (If you do decide to make an overhaul that will change everything, send a quick note to summarize proposed changes.) And certainly don't send three versions. Two is forgivable; we know you're human and that send button is just so temping--three is...inadvisable. I know email seems much less formal, but please, please don't do this. It drives us crazy. And assuming that we'll happily read your work three times (if we read the earlier two versions) is just, well, rude. And unrealistic. Also, please try not to use "sexy" to describe your work, especially if you are a man writing to a female agent. If you are a female writing to a female agent, especially if it's with regard to a romance or women's fiction, go for it. Otherwise, can feel unprofessional and rude. And last but certainly not least--don't be arrogant. Unless this work is really fantastic, it's going to be an uphill battle for this writer, as it already seems he thinks himself worthy of diva treatment.

From recent calls:

Him: Hi, I'm calling from London. I want to send you my work.

Me: Okay, please send us a query. To ___@____.com.

Him: Oh, you want me to mail it? Okay, I'll try to get stamps--

Me: No, please email. To ___@____.com.

Him: But the [LMP] says you want paper submissions.

Me: We used to. Now please send an e-mail.

Him: Are you sure?

Me: Yes.

Him: Really? Okay, so it says here your email is [not our email].

Me: No. It's ___@___.com.

Him: ____s@___.com?

Me: [Still in a sweet, patient voice] No, ____@___.com.

Him: Can I send you my manuscript?

Me: Please send a query letter first. By email.

Him: [Sounding truly defeated] Okay... [Hangs up]

Lessons: First of all, don't call--do your research. If you must call, please listen. The people who pick up the phone--whether an intern, assistant or agent--are likely well-versed on the submissions guidelines for their company. Don't treat them like they're dumb. This does not make you endearing. On the other hand, don't get intimidated. We don't make up rules to insult your work--they're there to make the process as efficient as possible for everyone involved.

3 comments:

Rebecca L Sutton said...

See, I read about people like this and it makes me feel a million times better about my query and communication. It's frightening what people say! At least it makes for a good laugh now and then during your day.

~Jamie said...

I am totally with Rebecca on this one.

Reading this makes me feel like I am at the very least doing my research, working to be less of a thorn in an agent's side, and hopefully acting professional.

A place where I struggle with professionalism, though it the networking aspect of it all. Take for example this blog... I get all crazy and just snap off a comment before even realizing what I've even typed! Even worse is me on twitter... I ramble on about useless crap, and then get worried I've said too much.

It's such a fine line between being REAL and PROFESSIONAL sometimes for me. It's a tough walk!

Stef Kramer said...

I was so completely relieved not so see a portion of my very own query letter on this post! I held my breath the entire time...